The Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon Contact | Site Map | Subscribe | Home

www.NewbergGraphic.com

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nv-contact.gif (1489 bytes)

Nv-advertise.gif (1492 bytes)

Archive

Subscribe

Weather



Springbrook residents bring fight to council

A Public Safety Building meeting room hosts more than 60 members of the community waiting to be heard

By Schellene Clendenin, Newberg Graphic reporter
E-mail Schellene at sclendenin@eaglenewspapers.com
    For a Newberg City Council meeting that held only one agenda item Monday evening – a request by the Newberg Fire Department to donate outdated fire equipment to area fire agencies – the waiting room of the Public Safety Building was packed with people.
   More than 60 community members, many residents of the Oaks at Springbrook subdivision behind Fred Meyer, showed up en masse, some to ask questions of the council during the public comment section of the meeting. The group was so large that council member Roger Currier commented it was the largest gathering at a council meeting since discussions surrounding possible construction of a Sumitomo Sitix plant began in 1995.
   Although public comment began with other matters, the majority of the time was taken up by residents of the Oaks at Springbrook. Ten Oaks residents spoke at the meeting. Many were worried about the investment they made in their homes and the possibility that property values will drop if a Stanton International furniture manufacturing plant is erected across Brutscher Street from their neighborhood.
   Dennis Scheuermann, a resident whose property abuts Fernwood Road, said a zone change allowing construction of the plant was incompatible with the neighborhood. He added that he and his neighbors were not notified of the zone change and that many members of the neighborhood were told by real estate agents that the vacant lot would be used for residential professional (R-P) development, not light industrial (M-1).
   Future notification of the change should be made, Scheuermann argued, with better signage that includes clearer language so nearby residents could understand proposals and take steps against them if necessary.
   Brenda Brady, another Oaks resident said she was excited when Oaks at Springbrook property became available for sale. But that was before the zoning was changed to M-1 and rumors of the sofa manufacturer began to surface.
   “We never dreamed we would face 20 to 30 trucks driving by a day,” she said. “We don’t feel it was fair that the zone was changed without notice and it should be changed back to where it was.”
   The overriding message from members of the audience was simple — they should have been notified before changes were made that could affect their homes, investments and the safety of their children, and they are willing to do battle for their neighborhood.
   Nearly all of the residents who spoke asked why notification wasn’t made by the city and, if it was, why it wasn’t made more clear?
   Within of the Springbrook Oaks Specific Plan is language that gives flexibility to the boundaries set aside for R-P and M-1 zones, according to the city. As long as each zoning type remain relatively fixed in size, boundaries can be changed by the city at the request of a developer. No notification of neighboring residents is required.
   When Jim Bennett, city manager, was asked by the council about who makes decisions on property changes, he replied that the city’s planning department has a  hand in reviewing the decision.
   Council member Roger Currier said the council was dumbfounded when they heard of the zone change. Currier said the changes were administrative, meaning they weren’t sent to the city planning commission for discussion, and made by the five or six members of the city planning staff — not by the city council.
   Currier said when changes were made in the Springbrook Oaks Specific Plan he pushed for providing notification of property changes to nearby residents, but his efforts were thwarted.
   “I was in heavy discussions and debates with city council at that time,” he said. “I went back in and spoke and said I disagreed with development code changes, but I didn’t ask the right questions.” Currier concluded that what is happening to Oaks at Springbrook residents was what he was trying to prevent.
 

From Nov. 3, 2004, Newberg Graphic
Click Here to Subscribe

 

 
SPONSORS:





 

 

 

 

Copyright 2004 Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon
Contact us with your questions or comments about the site.
This site is best viewed with
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0+